Mortgage rates dip below 3% – where to next?
In yesterday’s post I wrote that, over the last 15 years, “the 30-year Fixed Rate Mortgage (FRM) has averaged a spread of about 1.7% above the yield on the US 10-year Treasury (10T). With 10T yielding 0.62% that would imply a normalised FRM of 2.32%. But, as you may have noticed, these are not normal times.”
The vast amount of liquidity the Federal Reserve has pumped into the economy continues to sustain the stock market and has stabilized mortgage markets. Hence, we are seeing the spread referred to above come down from a high of 2.7% to the current 2.36%, still above historical levels.
What drives mortgage rates?
First, I will explain the link – or lack of link – between the Federal Funds rate (FF) and FRM – and what actually drives mortgage rates.
Five charts explain the factors driving mortgage rates. Mostly, the dates are those when the Fed has changed the FF over the last 5 years- 10 increases, followed by 5 decreases – plus two subsequent dates in 2020.
Fed Funds rate (FF)
The Fed Funds rate is the rate at which banks lend to each other overnight.
After increasing from 0% to 2.5% since late 2015, cuts in 2019 and 2020 have lowered the rate back down to 0.25%, following the dramatic and proactive cuts in March.
30-year Fixed Rate Mortgage (FRM)
The FRM reached nearly 5% in late 2018 and dropped to just below 3% for the first time this week.
10-year Treasury yield (10T)
The yield on the 10T is influenced by two major factors: the outlook for the economy (expanding businesses invest creating demand for money) and geopolitical events – the US dollar and US Treasuries are seen as a safe haven during times of uncertainty.
The yield reached 3.2% in November, 2018 (which was the time of the peak in the FRM), eased back under 2% in 2019 and then plummeted from 1.88% in early 2020 to just 0.58% in late April. It has mostly stayed in the 0.6-0.8% % range since then.
The spread, or difference, between FRM and FF
If there were a link between FF and FRM it would show up in this chart. In fact, the spread dropped from 3.7% in 2015 to 1.5% in 2019, increased to 3.26% in March and has since dropped back to 2.73%, demonstrating that there is no direct link between FF and FRM
The spread, or difference, between FRM and 10T
We see more consistency between FRM and 10T, where the spread was in a much tighter range of 1.5% to 1.8% until the second half of 2019 and into 2020.
Indeed, over the last several years the spread between FRM and 10T has been very stable averaging around 1.7%. But I would point out two things in this table: first, the spread widened significantly in the Great Recession in 2008; and, secondly, while the median spread for the year has been in a narrow range, within the years there have been quite wide variations – in particular look at 2008/2009 and again in 2020 where the spread has ranged from 1.8% to 2.7% – well above historic levels.
The FF rate affects the lending rate for credit cards, auto loans, adjustable rate mortgages, all of which are impacted by banks’ Prime Rates, which move with the FF rate. Fixed Rate Mortgages – the typical 30-year mortgage – have a longer life and their benchmark is the closest Treasury security, which is the 10T. Conventional mortgages are bundled and sold to investors, who require a risk premium – higher yield – over that offered by 10T.
As can be seen, that premium – spread – has been remarkable constant over recent years. It does fluctuate from time to time as the yield on 10T tends to move quickly at times – as we have seen this year – but in recent years it always comes back to around that 1.7% level.
Here are a few thoughts about the current situation:
1. While the economy has recovered many of the jobs lost during the early days of COVID-19, continuing unemployment claims are still a huge 17 million – and parts of the country are shutting down again.
2. It will not be known for some time how many business will not reopen or how many furloughed workers will face unemployment when their employers go out of business.
3. The country faces a consistent demand that it is time to do more than talk about the racism that still exists in so many ways. It is encouraging that so many major corporations have spoken our in recent weeks about the plans they are making to contribute to – and lead the way to – a more just society, And major groups in non-business areas are also speaking up.
As the last table showed, whereas over time the spread between FRM and 10T has been consistent in the 1.7% range, there have been wide variations in the short-term. We saw that in 2008 and 2009, a time of great economic duress when widespread buying of US Treasuries as a safe haven drove yields down and spreads widened. Those spreads returned to the norm as economic conditions improved.
The current economic situation is very different from the Great Recession. Indeed, but for COVID-19 the strength of the economy earlier in the year would have lead to expectations that the Fed would be increasing rates, rather than the dramatic cuts we saw.
Another factor is the demand for mortgage-backed securities (MBS), the bundles of mortgages sold to investors. In the Great Recession, investors were wary about the value of the underlying security – residential mortgages – and so demanded a larger premium.
Part of the reason that mortgage rates spiked initially in March was that investors stopped buying MBS as they were uncertain about the impact forbearance plans would have on mortgage interest payments. The MBS market recovered when the Fed stepped in as a buyer, but the uncertainties remain, leaving the Fed as the largest buyer of MBS.
In normal times I tell people to add 1.7% to the 10T yield to get an idea of where the FRM should be. But in 2008/09 and again in 2020 that formula was thrown off by extraordinary events, whether it be the Great Recession or COVID-19.
We are seeing signs of market stabilization with the spread between FRM and 10T dropping from a high of 2.72% to the current 2.36%, but it is still well above “normal” levels.
We are not going to see mortgage rates fall into line with the 10T + 1.7% formula (implying a FRM of 2.3%) again soon, because in times of economic stress the formula changes slightly to 10T +1.7% + a risk premium. Ideally, the spread would narrow as a result of rising yields on 10T as that would suggest that the economy is growing again. But there are too many unknowns to be able to guess when that may occur.
What we have seen is the start of a move, which may well be a longer-term trend, of people moving out of cities into the suburbs into larger houses with more open space around them (see article below). This is adding demand (from people selling higher-priced properties so more willing possibly to pay up) to a market suffering – in Essex County – from a 40% reduction in inventory compared with a year ago – when inventory was low anyway.
“If you’re interested in Marblehead, you have to visit the blog of Mr. Andrew Oliver, author and curator of OliverReports.com. He’s assembled the most comprehensive analysis of Essex County we know of with market data and trends going back decades. It’s a great starting point for those looking in the towns of Marblehead, Salem, Beverly, Lynn and Swampscott.”
Sagan Harborside Sotheby’s International Realty
One Essex Street | Marblehead, MA 01945
Sotheby’s International Realty® is a registered trademark licensed to Sotheby’s International Realty Affiliates LLC. Each Office Is Independently Owned and Operated